Accredited Psychiatry and Medicine
Medical and Psychiatric Experts
How is an Objective Medical/Psychiatric Opinion Formed?
A medical expert is a physician who has the requisite clinical experience
and academic achievement to form an objective medical opinion to
a reasonable degree of medical certainty. A forensic
psychiatrist is a physician who integrates clinical experience,
knowledge of medicine, mental health, and the neurosciences to form
an independent, objective opinion. Relevant data are gathered and
analyzed as part of a process of alternative hypothesis testing to
formulate an expert medical/psychiatric opinion. This expert opinion
can be effectively communicated by written report, deposition, or
courtroom testimony. The applications of forensic psychiatry are
widespread in settings ranging from health
care and the workplace to criminal
justice and public safety. Common areas of expertise are briefly
described below. For more details, see the left column listing of
specific areas of interest, or confidentially call or e-mail our
office directly.
Expert Multispecialty Team Analysis
Dr. Bursztajn continues to have an active clinical
practice and consults and teaches nationally both as an individual and
as a distinguished multispecialty team expert. He has had a long standing
special interest in medical and psychiatric diagnosis. His publications
analyzing clinical and forensic diagnosis and misdiagnosis range from
the highly acclaimed book Medical
Choices Medical Chances through Analysis:
DSM Biases Evident in Clinical Training and Courtroom Testimony published
in the September 2007 issue of Psychiatric Annals.
Review and analysis, consultation, and expert opinion formulation in
medical and mental health malpractice, product liability, and testamentary
capacity cases are a longstanding area of special interest. Responses
to initial telephone or e-mail inquiries regarding case merit and
expert assistance are at no cost, as well as referrals to colleagues
where a multispecialty expert team seems best.
Who Can Benefit?
A forensic psychiatrist/medical expert can assist individuals and institutions,
plaintiffs and defendants, attorneys, federal agencies, and the courts
to evaluate claims ranging from medical and mental health malpractice
to disability and sexual harassment. Organizations can also benefit
from an expert consultation evaluating the validity and response
strategy to employment, supervisory responsibility, or maintenance
of health care standards claims. Public safety and criminal justice
professionals can also find forensic expert consultation effective
in analyzing and preventing threats to security.
Some Examples of Expertise:
A physician who is an expert in psychiatry, primary medical care, medical
causation, and clinical ethics can analyze the informed consent process
and primary medical care decision making and formulate an expert
opinion applicable to specific questions, such as whether the standard
of primary medical and mental health care for medical decision making
and informed consent has been met by the treating physician, the
staff, and the health care organization.
Dr. Bursztajn has been retained by clinicians and institutions as an
expert for peer review and to consult to the courts and plaintiff's
and defense attorneys on questions such as:
-
Were appropriate professional relationships observed?
-
Was an appropriate informed consent process implemented?
-
Were appropriate steps taken to prevent a tragic outcome such as
suicide or a medication-related death or injury?
-
Was an appropriate referral made?
-
Were appropriate steps taken subsequently to mitigate the consequences
of a treatment-related death or injury?
-
What is the extent of impairment, pain, suffering, changed prognosis,
need for treatment, and loss of consortium that can be validly
attributed or is being misattributed causally?
In the workplace, the forensic psychiatrist may be asked to consider
whether a claimed disability (e.g., a chronic general illness, such
as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a chronic pain syndrome, such as Fibromyalgia,
or a mental disorder, such as Depression, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) is valid and work stress-related.
Some other frequently asked employment-related examination questions
are:
-
Is a claimed impairment subject to the ADA mandate for accommodation?
-
What is the appropriate organizational response to a sexual harassment
claim?
-
What is the validity and extent of sexual or racial harassment-related
damage claims, such as emotional injury or Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder?
Frequently asked questions range from evaluation of defendants for determining
mitigating and treatable neuropsychiatric disorders to advising safety
officials on courtroom and workplace security. Dr. Bursztajn is frequently
chosen as a peer reviewer by journals in medicine and psychiatry,
ranging from the Journal of the American Medical Association to the
American Journal of Psychiatry. Among his forensic psychiatric contributions
you can read his review of the book "Are
You There Alone?" The Unspeakable Crime of Andrea Yates,
by Suzanne O’Malley. New York, Simon & Schuster, 2004.
Areas of special interest include:
-
Competency to confess and false confessions
-
Competency to stand trial and post-Sell medication
issues
-
Neuropsychiatric and medication-related impairments diminishing capacity
and influencing mens rea
-
Mitigating factors and forensic neuropsychiatric evaluation as an
aid to sentencing, ranging from "white collar" to death
penalty fact patterns
-
Identification of malingering and its mimics
Product liability cases often raise issues of informed consent processes,
assumption of risk, professional and organizational ethics, complex
neuropsychiatric causation of claimed injuries, and the validity
and reliability of expert methodology and opinion formulation. There
can also be a question of distinguishing medical product liability
from the physician's or patient's knowing assumption of risk. Here
the level of informed consent available may be crucial.
Dr Bursztajn consults and teaches physicians, including psychiatrists,
regarding the fundamentals of informed consent processes. "Informed
Consent in Neuropsychosocialpharmacology," Psychiatric
Times, 2005; 22(13):59-63. His longstanding interest in the
ethical foundations of pharmaceutical and medical device research
led to his serving on the National Committee for Quality Assurance
(NCQA) under contract to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) in developing standards
for the accreditation of programs for the protection of human subjects.
These standards served as a basis for field testing and adoption
nationally by the Institute
of Medicine.
Areas of special interest include:
-
Protection of human research subjects and patient and public safety
-
Informed consent processes and assumption of risk
-
Effects of marketing on physician and patient decision-making including
the debate over
the current revision of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual (DSM)
-
Evaluation of claims of neuropsychiatric impairment
-
Effects of publicity, placebo, and nocebo effects on the doctor-patient
relationship and symptom presentation
In the wake of a series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on standards
for reliability of expert methodology, distinguished forensic psychiatric
experts may be asked to evaluate and opine as to the reliability
of forensic psychiatric methodology of previously retained experts.
Dr. Bursztajn has been retained as an "expert on experts" based
on his teaching and publications (see for example his recent article On
Skepticism and Tolerance in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry in
the Psychiatric Times' Forensic Bonus Issue) in the area of evaluation
of reliability of forensic methodology and his service on a variety
of relevant national professional standards committees. These range
from the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law Ethics Committee
to the American Bar Association's Advisory and Expert Panel for the
State Justice Institute (SJI) Benchbook Project on Psychiatric and
Psychological Evidence.
Questions of interest include whether the opinion of an expert meets
generally accepted standards for reliability for forensic medical,
psychiatric, and mental health evaluations. These include analyses
of an expert's methodology for reliability of:
-
Data gathering
-
Data analyses
-
Opinion formulation
Dr. Bursztajn's classic article Avoiding
Ipse Dixit Mislabeling: Post-Daubert Approaches to Expert Clinical Opinions (J
Am Acad Psychiatry Law 31:205-10, 2003) informs us how experts
can reduce the likelihood that their conclusions will be mislabeled.
He continues to advise clinical experts across the spectrum of medical
specialties, the bar, and the judiciary as to the fundamentals of clinical
expertise post-Daubert/Joiner/Kumho evidentiary
standards for the reliability of testimony of clinical experts. Also,
see Dr. Bursztajn and colleagues explore the evolving role of the clinical
expert post-Kumho in
his article, Kumho for Clinicians
in the Courtroom.
Harold
J. Bursztajn, MD -[Curriculum Vitae]-
has over twenty-five years of service as a distinguished patient care-focused
clinician and as senior clinical faculty at Harvard Medical School. Among
his many distinctions at Harvard Medical School is being recognized as
a practicing "doctor's doctor" by being named Principal Mentor
at Harvard Medical School and being awarded the A.
Clifford Barger Excellence in Mentoring Award as well as being the
first physician/forensic psychiatrist in Harvard Medical School's history
to be appointed as the representative of the Harvard Medical School Alumni
Board of Directors to the Harvard University Alumni Board. He continues
to be active in patient care, forensic consultation, and judicial education.
Among the many clinical honors bestowed by Dr. Bursztajn's patients and
colleagues nationwide is his being recently named to the "Best Doctors
in America" list.
He is co-Founder of the Program in Psychiatry and the Law at the Beth
Israel Deaconess Medical Center Department of Psychiatry of Harvard
Medical School and Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at
Harvard Medical School. Author of the highly acclaimed book, Medical
Choices, Medical Chances this classic has been reviewed
favorably in leading medical journals ranging from the New
England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American
Medical Association to the American Journal of Psychiatry.
Among his other leading contributions to medical and mental health
education are three books Divided
Staffs, Divided Selves, a Case Approach to Mental Health Ethics, Decision
Making in Psychiatry and the Law and Psychiatric
Ethics and the Rights of Persons with Mental Disabilities in Institutions
and the Community, as well as numerous articles in medicine,
psychiatry, forensic neuropsychiatry and clinical ethics.
Dr. Bursztajn consults clinically and forensically, provides second opinions
in patient care, teaches medical students and conducts continuing
medical education courses for professionals; and advises institutions,
the courts, and public health-oriented media on forensic psychiatry
and clinical ethics-related issues. He serves as a peer reviewer
expert for leading medical and psychiatric journals, non-profit medical
and ethics review organizations, health care and human services corporations
and the judiciary. His numerous awards and honors in the course of
twenty-five years of service as a Harvard Medical School clinical
faculty member range from the Solomon Faculty Research Prize to his
being named as one of only fifty Principal Clinical Mentors for Harvard
Medical School entering class.
In addition to his twenty-five-year commitment to patient care, Dr. Bursztajn
consults nationally and internationally to individuals and institutions,
plaintiff and defense attorneys, and the courts as a distinguished
forensic psychiatric expert. Among his areas of expertise are treating
vulnerable patients, improving medical and mental health decision
making, informed consent and malpractice and product liability risk
reduction, and standards for the forensic evaluation of employment-related
claims, diminished capacity, psychiatric autopsies, and violence
prevention.
Dr. Bursztajn is active in public education and promoting intergenerational
learning and inquiry. Contributions to public education include his
work as a guest analyst on news programs including CNN
Headline News, Boston's WCVB News
Show Chronicle and public education programs such as those presented
by ABC's Discovery Channel including "Who
Killed Julius Caesar?, " "Who
Killed Tutankhamun?," "Who
Killed Alexander the Great?,"
"The Mysterious Death of Cleopatra," and "Columbus:
Secrets From The Grave."
His work in public education with teams of experts from a variety of
scientific and humanities backgrounds has been recognized both academically
in Harvard Magazine and
publicly in The
Sunday London Times.
Dr. Bursztajn teaches and consults nationally to psychiatrists and other
mental health professionals, as well as to physicians across the
primary and specialty medical care spectrum. He serves as faculty
for the Harvard Medical School Psychiatric Intensive Diagnostic Interviewing
Preparatory Course for the Board of Psychiatry & Neurology certification
examinations. He continues to publish and present workshops nationally
and internationally on a variety of special interest topics in medicine
and in general and forensic neuropsychiatry.
There are a variety of areas of human suffering which, insofar as they
evoke painful or frightening feelings, can become all too sadly unspeakable.
Among Dr. Bursztajn's special interests are the long term consequences
of massive psychic trauma. Over the years he has explored this topic
in workshops for health
care providers both nationally and internationally. Dr. Bursztajn's
motivation for becoming a doctor and for continuing to practice clinically
and to teach nationally can be found in the following article: "The
Shoah and its Aftermath," which presents the testimony of
Dr. Bursztajn father, a Holocaust survivor.