Emotional & Physical Damages

Forensic psychiatrists evaluate the validity of psychological and emotional damages by way of providing data for the finder of fact as to causation and damages across the spectrum of civil litigation ranging from negligence to employment related issues.

Conscious Pain and Suffering

Claims of conscious pain and suffering may be difficult to support. The task of the forensic psychiatrist in such cases is to reconstruct the state of mind along scientifically acceptable principles. The following cases demonstrate the forensic psychiatric evaluation of conscious pain and suffering.

Persistent Pain and Well-being

Persistent pain was a commonly reported health problem among primary care patients and was consistently associated with psychological illness across centers. Large variation in frequency and the inconsistent relationship between persistent pain and disability across centers suggests caution in drawing conclusions about the role of culture in shaping responses to persistent pain when comparisons are based on patient samples drawn from a limited number of health care settings in each culture. [Gureje, Oye, PhD, FWACP, et al, JAMA, July 8, 1998, Vol 280, p.147]

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The courts recognize Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a type of damages. The cause and effects of PTSD must be distinguished from causes and effects of other symptoms or conditions. Therefore, the presence of PTSD can be verified or disclaimed only by a trained evaluator. The following cases used forensic psychiatric testimony to support or refute claims of PTSD related injury.

Historical Context:

Grief & Mourning

Stress

Neuropsychiatry

Brain Imaging

Dr. Bursztajn was among the first experts to be allowed to use brain imaging in the courtroom to support a forensic neuropsychiatric evaluation and testimony:

Dr. Bursztajn's pro bono work dealing with PTSD