The Role of a Training Protocol in Formulating Patient Instructions as
to Terminal Care Choices
Harold Bursztajn
Mr. Bursztajn is a fourth-year student at
Harvard Medical School. Boston. This manuscript was prepared during a
special fellowship year (1975-76) supported by Harvard
Medical School.
The wide discussion generated by the case of Karen Anne Quinlan has added
to the growing interest in means by which individuals may choose not
to have their lives prolonged under certain conditions. In both public
and professional sectors it has been suggested that patients' instructions
to their physicians regarding terminal care choices be facilitated through
signing a statement called "the Living Will." On Jan. 1, 1977,
California became the first state to recognize, through legislation,
a certain class of "Living Wills."
Given such interest, physicians may expect increasingly frequent patient
requests for help in drawing up a document setting forth their choices
about terminal care. In order that the patient may be benefited by such
a document, the physician must be trained to respond to such requests
in a manner which minimizes its risks. The risks involved are located
in both the uncertainty inherent in making choices prior to the actual
terminal care situation and the uncertainty in interpretation of such
documents [1-3] stemming from vagueness of wording,
disregard of variation among patients, and lack of mechanism for resolution
of conflict regarding intent.
A central task of medical education has been described as training for
uncertainty [4]. In this task various skills are employed
in obtaining, using, and communicating information. Among these skills
is the ability to ask a minimum set of standard questions, which screen
for the presence of symptoms as found in the traditional review of systems.
An extension of this method, elaborated in protocols for training paramedical
personnel [5], is the common symptom guides [6]
designed to ensure that certain crucial questions are asked whenever
a patient presents with a particular complaint (for example, abdominal
pain) or request (for example, for pain relief). What is proposed here
is to initiate training of physicians in use of a protocol to help a
patient draw up a Living Will. The successful use of such a training
protocol could begin to meet the existing need for a more structured
education in the care of the terminally ill [7], and
to minimize uncertainty by achieving standards of uniformity and reproducibility
in this aspect of medical care while leaving room for individual variation.
Description
The Training Protocol for Formulating Patient Instructions [*]
consists of six stages, and in the clinical setting involves a student
working with an assigned patient. In Stage I the patient states in his
own words instructions regarding terminal care choices. A review is then
conducted which obtains, as a minimum, information which answers the
following questions: (a) Why make explicit a guide to terminal care choices
prior to the terminal care situation arising? (b) When (that is, under
what circumstances) should the choices expressed in this document become
operative? (c) Who should carry out such choices? (d) What should such
choices be? (e) Where (for example, in which hospital or home setting)
should such choices become operative? (f) How ought conflict regarding
intent be resolved, if it arises? (g) Are there other points the patient
wishes to include?
In Stage II a case study of a patient's responses is read by both the
student and his assigned patient. The case study involves a model Living
Will in a question (that is, those of Stage I) and answer format. In
Stage III both the patient and the trainee are asked: With which answers
to the questions outlined in the case study do they (a) agree with as
choices they would make for themselves; (b) disagree with but believe
that others in this society, if they wish, ought to be able to make;
(c) disagree, and believe that no one in this society should be so able
to choose? Stage IV involves a review of various existing versions of
a Living Will [1-3]. Stage V is a discussion of the
risks attendant on Living Will documents. In Stage VI a Living Will document
is drawn up. A minimum document should include information which answers
the questions asked in Stage I, be signed by the patient and whoever
is designated to carry out patient choices (for example, family physician),
and contain provisions for annual review.
Discussion
The process of ascertaining a person's values by review of case studies
involving the value choices in question has been previously described
[8]. The application of a protocol offers physicians
a structured approach to helping patients make informed choices about
their terminal care. The end product is a tailor-made document designed
to fit the needs of a particular doctor-patient relationship and yet
a document having the certain minimal uniformity and reproducibility
which would be necessary for standard use.
Possible benefits of such protocol use extend beyond terminal care. Involving
the student and patient in making explicit choices under ambiguous conditions
may lead both to accept the fact that clinical judgment is no more exempt
from uncertainty than is physics [9]. The range of what
may be facilitated by such acceptance extends from personal growth [10]
to a decrease in the current rate of malpractice litigation. Moreover,
the protocol, suitably modified, can be used in health promotion and
presentation. For example. with hypertension and obesity the protocol
can serve as a formal aid to eliciting a patient's values and encouraging
his participation in the regimen, whereas the physician now must rely
on informal methods such as setting treatment goals.
The alternatives to such a protocol are adopting a simple variant of
the Living Will [1] or rejecting the possibility of
documenting the patient's terminal care choices. Both alternatives avoid
the costs of the protocol's length, complexity, and need for curricular
revision. However, these alternatives, insofar as they leave the present
situation of high uncertainty unaltered, have costs all their own.
[*] Abbreviated. For full training protocol,
send stamped, self-addressed envelope to author.
References
-
A Living Will. New York: Euthanasia Educational
Council, 1974.
-
Stead, E. If I Become Ill and Unable to Manage
My Affairs. Med. Times, 98:191, August 1970.
-
Bok, S. Personal Directions for Care at the
End of Life. N. Eng. J. Med., 295:367-369, 1976.
-
Fox, R. C. Training for Uncertainty. In The
Student-Physician. R. K. Merton, G. G. Reader, and P. L. Kendall
(Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1957,
Pp. 207-241.
-
Komaroff, A. L. et al. Protocols for Physician's
Assistants. N. Eng. J. Med., 290:307- 312, 1974.
-
Wasson, J., Walsh, B. T., Tompkins, R., and
Sox, H., JR. The Common Symptom Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1975.
-
Dickinson, G. E. Death Education in U.S. Medical
Schools. J. Med. Educ., 51:134-136, 1976.
-
Kohlberg. L. Stages of Moral Development as
a Basis for Moral Education. In Moral Education: Interdisciplinary
Approaches. C. M. Back, B. S. Critenden, and E. V. Sullivan (Eds.).
Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 1971.
-
Heisenberg, W. Physics and Philosophy. New
York: Harper and Row, 1958.
-
Mayeroff, M. On Caring. New York: Harper
and Row, 1971, P. 68.