Heisch V. Morton, Et Al.
Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County
Civil Action - Law Jury Trial Demanded
No. 97 CV 1853
Plaintiff Attorney:
Joseph P. Lenahan, Esq.
Lenahan & Dempsey
116 N. Washington Avenue
Kane Building, Suite 400
Scranton, PA 18503
Defendant Attorneys:
For Wayne Memorial:
John Q. Durkin, Esq.
O' Malley & Harris
345 Wyoming Avenue
Scranton, PA 18503
For Dr. Morton, Dr. Milks,
Pediatric Practices of Nepa
And Dr. Cita:
David W. Saba, Esq.
Suite 200
400 3rd Avenue
Kingston, PA 18704-5816
Plaintiff Expert Witness:
Harold J. Bursztajn, M.D.
Associate Clinical Professor Harvard Medical School co-Director Program
in Psychiatry & the Law
96 Larchwood Drive
Cambridge, MA 02138
Settlement: Confidential
Case Description:
A lack of response to parents' concerns that an infant in respiratory
distress be transferred to intensive care can result in lifelong neuropsychiatric
impairment. Kenneth Heisch (DOB: April 27, 1995) suffered from respiratory
distress after his birth by a caesarean section. His parents' pleadings
that he be transferred to a setting where he could receive more intensive
care were initially disregarded. Dr. Harold J. Bursztajn of Cambridge,
MA, a forensic neuro-psychiatrist testified for the plaintiffs as to
the medical cause of Kenneth Heisch's neuro-psychiatric impairment He
testified that the delay in transfer resulted in Kenneth Heisch suffering
brain injury and neuro-psychiatric impairment due to a lack of oxygen
and shunting of blood flow away from oxygen starved brain tissue. Dr.
Bursztajn's testimony regarding the cause of Kenneth Heisch's neuropsychiatric
impairments countered the defense pediatric neurologist's claim that
Kenny's suffering was in the autistic spectrum of disorders unrelated
to neonatal hypoxia, Dr. Bursztajn testified that Kenneth Heisch's impairments
in autobiographical memory and executive functions such as judgment and
planning were characteristic of the diffuse cortical injuries caused
by perinatal hypoxia and shunting. Subsequent to Dr. Bursztajn's testimony,
before the case was brought to the jury, the defense settled to the satisfaction
of the plaintiff. The amount of the settlement is confidential.