Clinical Expertise in Medical Product Litigation
On not "losing in translation"
Harold J. Bursztajn, M.D. Director
Harvard Medical School
Program in Psychiatry & the Law
E-mail: harold_bursztajn@hms.harvard.edu
With thanks to the Harvard Medical School Program in Psychiatry and the
Law
Communications counsel provided by Gavin Anderson & Co.
E-mail: millingworth@gavinanderson.com
Merck’s product liability challenge
"Looming lawsuits, angry investors, declining profits: The Vioxx
debacle is just the latest setback for the proud pharmaceutical giant." Fortune,
November 1, 2004
. . . there was murder before Prozac . . . eg. Cain and Abel
Introduction
-
Medical Expertise
-
Legal Expertise
-
Scientific Expertise
Disparate Disciplines + Different Languages + Adversarial System = Disastrous
Consequence
The Goal
Medical/Clinical Expertise + Legal Expertise + Scientific Expertise =
Integrated Structured Communications
Who do you hire . . .
. . . to run the Boston Red Sox?
Shakespeare knoweth the books, but, alas, not the baseball
A baseball player knows baseball, but . . . Well, frankly, he's not telling
Answer - Theo Epstein!
What is the clinician's role?
Translation from the Attorney's perspective:
-
Hired Gun = Credible, Objective Advisor
-
Exclusivity = Confidentiality
-
"Cheap" Help = Wise Investment
-
Attorney's Dummy = Sherlock Holmes
What is the clinician's role?
Translation from the Clinician's perspective:
-
Find Clinical Cause = Find Medical-Legal Cause
Navigating the continuum
-
The clinician's role and relationships may exist along a continuum
from Hired Gun to Credible, objective advisor
-
An outside consultation with an "expert's expert" is
valuable in moving the relationship from point A to point B
Breaking language barriers
-
Develop cultural competence
-
Identify points of perspective difference
-
Work to bridge perspective gap
-
Identify complementary skill sets
-
Take the long view of cost-benefit analysis
When to seek an interpreter
-
Clinical Causation
-
Choose the "right" experts
-
Medical-Legal Causation
-
Provide black letter, case law & statutory interpretation
Choosing the "right" expert
-
Clinical Experience
-
Integrity
-
Doctors' Doctor
-
Ego in Check
-
Forensic Expertise
-
Translation Skills
Goal = Attribute Balance
Pitfalls to avoid
-
Poor Communication
-
Occurs because of fear of distortion
-
Remedy is careful, precise written communication
-
Requires team to take the long view
-
Focusing on Cost only
-
Reasons this occurs
-
Fee structure of attorney-client relationship
-
Fear expert will be mis-characterized as a hired
gun
-
Remedy = i.d. experts with substantial reduced-fee or pro
bono practices made possible by forensic practice
-
Make this explicit in direct examination
-
Retaining Less Qualified Experts
-
Careful screening of experts is required
-
The best expert is:
-
Analytical
-
Detail-oriented
-
Articulate
-
Versed in other opinions
-
Critical Thinker
-
Kind and strong
-
Confusing Superficiality with Simplicity
-
The goal should be opinions that are simple and valid
-
Retain an expert who can convey complex analysis in simple
terms
-
Structure the relationship to allow the expert to perform
a thorough evaluation
Choose Wisely
-
Choose an expert and structure the relationship so that the expert
can:
-
Review, analyze, compare & cross-check data
-
Consider strengths & weaknesses of a case
-
Review & analyze opinions of other experts
-
Synthesize & translate expert opinions
-
Articulate underlying methodology & reasoning
-
Distinguish between contradictory opinions & different
case fact patterns
-
Rule out suggestibility & "bandwagon" effects
-
Analyze & opine on reliability of other experts' methodologies
-
Be kind & strong
Model expert skill set
The "best" expert must be able to see and comprehend a host
of factors related to the plaintiff:
-
Medical & psychiatric history
-
Life history
-
School & employment records
-
Informed consent
-
Assumption of risk
-
Inadequacy of treating MD's opinion
-
Motivation for litigation
-
Preexisting conditions denied
-
Misattribution of causality?
-
Intervening variables
-
Comparative liability
Remember . . .
-
Not all side effects are caused by prescribed medications
-
Clinical experts emphasize irreducible uncertainty
Guiding principles
-
Opinions will evolve over time
-
Track data needs as the case progresses
-
Schedule expert depositions later
-
Expert becomes consultant after opinion is formulated
-
Testimony preparation is key
-
Maintain consulting relationship after testimony
-
Experts Need to Deliver "IOU's"
Parting Thoughts
-
The expert as consultant & educator:
-
Raises new questions and opens new lines of analysis
-
Translates and communicates
-
Works toward validity, meaningfulness, and simplicity